Saturday, December 15, 2007

When Personal Moral Values Conflict with Gay Rights at Work

One of the most commonly asked questions I get in my work as a corporate trainer on gay and transgender issues is, "How do I help myself or others reconcile personal moral values with the company's support of gay issues?"


Here's how I respond:

There is an important difference between our beliefs and our behaviors.

You are free to believe whatever you want about homosexuality or any other issue, such as racial equality, the role of women, or the supremacy of a particular religious tenet, but you can’t impose those beliefs on your colleagues at work. Doing so violates corporate policy.

As an employee, you are paid to manifest the company’s values. The company values the diversity of its workforce and seeks to create an environment that is safe and productive for everyone. It has policies that support its gay and lesbian employees just as it does its heterosexual employees because it wants to attract and retain the best and brightest talent.

Some employees may feel that their religious beliefs are not being supported by the company’s policy that prohibits discrimination based upon sexual orientation. They may feel that providing domestic partner benefits is sanctioning same-sex relationships. They may feel that being asked to attend diversity classes on gay issues is forcing them to show support for something they find to be personally offensive or immoral. They may feel that the company providing money to gay employee organizations for educational or social events is showing unnecessary support for a “lifestyle” that has nothing to do with the company’s bottom line.

All of these feelings are understandable. Acting on those feelings at work is unacceptable.

Most employees have some feelings of disagreement, disappointment, or even disgust with some company policy or practice, as well as with some of their colleagues. Some employees, for instance, object to the donations made by the company to political parties. Some people feel that women should not give orders to men. Others object to sharing an office with a person of another race, culture, or faith. There are employees who oppose divorce and question providing health care benefits to remarried colleagues. Other employees are upset by the company’s disregard for their strict vegetarian beliefs and behaviors. And some employees find abhorrent conservative religious beliefs. That’s diversity, and the company manages its increasingly diverse workforce by minimizing behavioral conflict while maximizing the bottom line, which is profit.

So, feel the feelings, but choose the behavior. It’s okay to wish that a colleague wasn’t gay, just as it’s okay to wish that a colleague wasn’t Muslim, Jewish, or Christian. Other employees or executives could have negative feelings about you too. But the company insists that as long as you work for them, you will treat the gay employee, or the one who is Muslim, female, divorced, a meat eater or a conservative Christian or Jew with professional respect, courtesy, and as a full and equal member of the team. The company requires all of us to behave in such a way as to optimize the productivity of everyone on the team.

And, while we are free to believe whatever we choose to believe, we all need to be aware that our beliefs impact our “music,” or our day-to-day interactions with others. Our ability to effectively manage employees about whom we have negative feelings is fully dependent upon our cognizance of own beliefs, and our skill at overcoming our impulse to be disapproving, disinterested, or disengaged. While you may not approve of homosexuality, it’s essential that you do nothing at work to communicate those feelings in any way to anyone. Doing so undermines the company’s values and your value to the company.

I have heard horror stories of managers saying to others at work that homosexuality is a sin, publicly speculating with disdain whether an employee is gay, making decisions about promotions based upon a person’s sexual orientation or “lifestyle,” laughing at or repeating offensive gay jokes, and ridiculing the mannerisms or attire of someone suspected of being gay. All of these behaviors are a violation of the company’s code of conduct and should be immediately reported to the office of Human Resources.

But the more common negative everyday experiences of gay, lesbian, and bisexual employees involves the behavior of avoidance by their manager and colleagues, of being shut out of the social interactions of the company. Especially in companies that have policies and procedures that seek to attract and retain gay employees, the behaviors which make the employee feel less safe and valued are the ones that make them feel marginalized. Sometimes it’s the awareness that they are the only ones not asked on Monday morning how their weekend was spent. Sometimes it’s never being asked about the photograph of their partner in their work area. Generally, it’s the feeling that they are invisible.

Avoidance is not an effective business strategy. It is a negative behavior. Managers, even those with conflicting moral beliefs, need to positively engage, not sidestep those with whom they differ. Such efforts can make a big difference in ensuring the environment at work feels welcoming, and therefore more productive.

Practical Suggestions:

  • Understand the difference between beliefs and behaviors.
  • Be aware of your feelings and take an honest inventory of your behavior.
  • Avoidance is a behavior.
  • Always assume that there is a gay person, or a family member or friend of a gay person, in your presence.
  • Treat everyone equally, personally and professionally.
  • Use the words “gay,” “lesbian,” “bisexual,” and “transgender” respectfully.
  • Do not laugh at or repeat anti-gay comments or jokes.
  • Immediately correct inappropriate behaviors on the part of others.
  • Sponsor diversity training on gay issues.
  • Attend functions sponsored by the gay employee group.
  • Use inclusive language at work, such as asking if people have partners rather than if they are married.
  • Bring gay people into social conversations.
  • Sit with a gay person in the cafeteria, or invite him or her to sit with you.
  • Create an environment in which people can safely tell you that they are gay.
If you have comments about these thoughts or further questions on gay and transgender issues in the workplace, I look forward to hearing from you at brian@brian-mcnaught.com or visit my web site at www.brian-mcnaught.com.


Posted by Brian at 20:46:19 | Permanent Link | Comments (0) |

Wednesday, December 05, 2007

What's Facing Gay and Transgender ERGs

The formidable task facing corporations globally is bridging the enormous gap between their policies and their business cultures. The formidable tasks facing gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender Employee Resource Groups (ERGs) are decerning what value they bring to the table, and creating safe space for their colleagues working in unwelcoming areas of the world.

When corporations say that they value diversity, they mean that they believe the person who is male or female, white, black, red, yellow or brown, straight, bisexual, or gay, transgender or not, brings unique gifts to the table because of his or her life experiences which have been impacted by their gender, race, sexual orientation, gender identity, religious beliefs, disability, etc. So, what unique gifts do gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender people bring to the table? Beyond saying that they can help the company reach the gay and transgender buying public, or can act as educators on these issues in the workplace, what is special about the lessons learned from the life experiences of growing up gay or transgender?

When I ask an audience of gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender employees what they can't do at work because they're gay or transgender, they have no difficulty listing the dozens of ways that heterosexual privilege negatively impacts them. "If we're not out, we can't put a picture of the person we care about on our desk, we can't comfortably make personal phone calls, we can't freely talk about gay news items, etc. If we are out, we get marginalized. People don't ask us about our weekend plans. They're afraid to engage us so they avoid us."

"Good. So, now come up with a list of the special gifts you bring to the table because you're gay or transgender," I say." Why should the company value you rather than accommodate you?"

The silence is deafening. We're very good at telling how we're victimized by heterosexism and homophobia, but not so good yet on articulating our strengths. That is a challenge that has to be addressed with the same focus and determination as was given to the struggle for legal protection and domestic partner benefits. In a world that is fueled by competition and survival of the fittest, everyone needs to focus on what unique skills they have that are essential to the success of the larger group and that are irreplaceable.

Secondly, the gay and transgender ERGs need to focus on the corporate culture outside the safety of company headquarters and large, liberal urban areas. In the minds of many human resource professionals, gay and transgender people have articulated a list of needs which the company has successfully met. They have a 100% rating from the Human Rights Campaign in the U.S. or from Stonewall in the U.K. because they have non-discrimination policies that include sexual orientation and gender identity, they provide domestic partner benefits, they support their gay and transgender ERGs, and they have shown public support on gay and transgender issues. In their minds, there are other issues of diversity now which demand their attention.

The leadership of the gay and transgender workplace movement has been willfully negligent about articulating the need for corporate-wide diversity training on gay and transgender issues, and making such training necessary for perfect scores of approval. Diversity training has always been an ugly stepsister to many national gay groups and to many gay and transgender ERGs, mentioned in passing but not with focus. We're paying the price today for this negligence. Heterosexual colleagues have not been given the tools to walk the corporate talk. In some settings, such as in corporate headquarters, people know to walk the line because they're being watched, but in other sites and in offices in other cultures, the policies are often disregarded by people who don't understand or agree with them. This creates an unwelcoming climate for the gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender people working in those environments.

Twenty years ago, when I first changed the focus of my training from university to corporate settings, I always knew that it would be a lot easier to conduct training in New York City than it would in company branches in Dallas, Oklahoma City, Orlando, or Detroit. When diversity training on gay and transgender issues were offered in those sites, enormous change took place in the workplace environment. Once educated to the business-connection of diversity policies, and told what is expected of them, heterosexual colleagues can become heterosexual allies. But while progress has been made, it is spotty.

Chubb's gay and transgender ERG, called GLEN, was featured in a recent edition of the Wall Street Journal because of the diversity training they were providing at every company site in the country. They offer us a model of what other ERGs need to take on as their next agenda. They have secured the support of their director of diversity in taking time out from their regular assignments and heading out two by two, gay and straight, male and female, to put a face on the issue for their colleagues throughout the country, thereby making each place more welcoming for the gay and transgender people who work there.

Ray and I are about to head to the Pacific Rim where I, at the invitation of Merrill Lynch, will do diversity training for the senior management of the firm's offices in the region. The company's gay and transgender ERG has been an active partner in securing this training. If you think it's challenging for a gay man, lesbian woman, bisexual person or transsexual to work in rural Georgia, think about working in a country where homosexual behavior is punishable by law.

My focus will not only be to help create a workplace that feels safer and more welcoming, but also focus attention on what unique, valuable, and irreplaceable gifts gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender employees bring to the workplace in those cultures.
Posted by Brian at 07:00:54 | Permanent Link | Comments (0) |